Jimmy Lai is accused of conspiring with others to call for international sanctions or engage in hostile activities against Hong Kong or China. ![]() Lai said he has not heard any fresh updates from the British government since Cleverly visited Beijing last month and raised his father’s case, among other topics, with his Chinese counterparts. government speaking out of both sides of its mouth - on the one hand it says something about Jimmy Lai’s case, and throws us some breadcrumbs, and on the other hand they take that away by pushing the message that it’s business as usual.” “We’re seeing very mixed messaging from the government as a whole,” she said. It is very worrying,” he added.Ĭaoilfhionn Gallagher, a London-based rights lawyer who is leading the Lais’ international legal team, said Foreign Secretary James Cleverly and Prime Minister Rishi Sunak have declined to meet with Sebastien Lai despite repeated requests. He’s 75, he’s in prison, he does risk just dying. Kaplan in a written ruling last week said that Bankman-Fried had not specified which pieces of evidence he had been unable to access and noted that the defendant had not asked for a trial delay despite the judge’s offer to consider one.“I don’t want to see my father die in jail. “If it is true that he has intimidated witnesses, at a certain point, he makes his own bed, he sleeps in it,” Nardini said. US Circuit Judge William Nardini said Bankman-Fried should have considered the possibility of losing internet access before sharing Ellison’s writings. Sassoon said the government had taken “extraordinary measures” to try to help Bankman-Fried prepare for trial from behind bars, and that Bankman-Fried had seven months with unrestricted internet access while free on $250m bail at his parents’ Palo Alto, California, home. They questioned Danielle Sassoon, a prosecutor, about what Cohen said were inadequacies in accommodations Kaplan and the MDC had made to try to allow Bankman-Fried to access the internet, including by visiting his lawyers in a cell at the federal courthouse in Manhattan twice a week. The judges appeared slightly more open to Bankman-Fried’s argument that jailing him violates his right under the Constitution’s Sixth Amendment to aid in his own defence because his case is complicated and he lacked internet access in jail to review prosecutors’ evidence. He has pleaded not guilty, while acknowledging risk management failures. ![]() Prosecutors accused him of looting billions of dollars in FTX customer funds to plug losses at Alameda, buy luxury real estate and donate to US political campaigns. ![]() The judges did not say when they would rule on Bankman-Fried’s bid to be released from Brooklyn’s Metropolitan Detention Center.īankman-Fried faces seven charges of fraud and conspiracy stemming from the November 2022 collapse of FTX, the now-bankrupt crypto exchange he founded. “There isn’t a First Amendment right to try to discredit or influence a witness who might testify against you, is there?” US Circuit Judge Denny Chin said. Keep reading list of 4 items list 1 of 4 Why was Rolling Stone’s Jann Wenner removed from Rock & Roll Hall board? list 2 of 4 YouTube cuts off Russell Brand’s ad revenue after assault claims list 3 of 4 From ‘The War Room’ to Romania, what’s Andrew Tate’s appeal? list 4 of 4 Sikh, Muslim leaders call for action as Canada probes Sikh leader’s killing end of listĮllison has pleaded guilty to fraud and is expected to testify against Bankman-Fried.Ī three-judge panel of the 2nd US Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan challenged Bankman-Fried lawyer Mark Cohen’s assertion that Kaplan had not sufficiently considered the defendant’s right under the US Constitution’s First Amendment to speak with the press and try to restore his reputation.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |